Quantcast Roger Goodell Aiming To Reduce Draft Time Limit
Home Forum Articles Rankings Register Cheatsheets Waiver Wire Blogs Forum Spy S/O Sportsbook Fantasy Games Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools


Old 05-17-2007, 09:29 AM   #1
who me?
Admin
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: L.A. (Lower Arkansas)
Posts: 30,001
vCash: 14556672
Donate
Blog Entries: 18
Roger Goodell Aiming To Reduce Draft Time Limit

Curious what people think about this.

The NFL Draft has become one of the most watched events in all of sports and is incredibly popular.

I fully expect most to agree and want the time limit shorted, since most people are in the mode of speeding everything up for the sake of speeding it up. But why? What is the importance of speeding the NFL draft up? Why would this even be a consideration?

This is an even that is constantly growing in popularity, I can't understand why Goodell would want to mess with it.
Mike is online now   Reply With Quote
Welcome to The The Sports Outlaw.

You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.

By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

As soon as you register, this box and ad will disappear.

Old 05-17-2007, 09:44 AM   #2
Who Me?
Admin
 
Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 16,090
vCash: 59047993
Donate
Blog Entries: 28
Send a message via AIM to Miller
I agree with it, it takes too damn long, especially the first round. Your right, it's becoming more and more popular, and will continue to do so if you didn't have a 6 hr 1st round. 10 minutes a pick in rounds 1 & 2 and 5 minutes after that is plenty IMO.
Miller is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 05-17-2007, 10:46 AM   #3
Bringin' Sexy Back
 
BPipes81's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 794
vCash: 1592
Donate
With all the preparation for the draft that these teams do, there is very little reason they even need 10 minutes per pick, except to work out trades. I suspect they would figure out a way to do that no matter what, so i say 10 would be the absolute maximum for the first round with something like 7 or 8 for the second.
BPipes81 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 05-17-2007, 12:27 PM   #4
Deputy
Premium Member
Forum Leader
 
Phicinfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 11,135
vCash: 132430
Donate
Send a message via AIM to Phicinfan
To answer Mike's question, it is to move it to Prime time. If you shorten the rounds, it will be the predecessor to moving the draft to a prime time slot, rather than early saturday...hoping to attract even more viewers and ratings.

I also like the idea, 10min in first round, 5mins 2nd and down to 3-2 min all rounds after that. Keeps the draft flowing.
Phicinfan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 05-17-2007, 12:32 PM   #5
who me?
Admin
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: L.A. (Lower Arkansas)
Posts: 30,001
vCash: 14556672
Donate
Blog Entries: 18
Yeah, I know it is to move it to prime time, I just don't want to see it changed.

I like getting up Saturday Morning, listening to pre-draft shows, and then in between draft picks, hearing reports/breakdowns on the players.

To me, it works great, no reason to change it. It already draws a bigger audience than any other sporting event, and being covered by two tv networks.

And I especially don't understand why, just because we get a new commissioner, that things have to change.

Shorten the draft, play games in other countries, exted the season to 17 games and further screw up the record books. Then once we start playing more games in other countries, we get teams in other countries, expand the NFL again, and further water down the competition.

I am quickly getting tired of this commissioner.
Mike is online now   Reply With Quote

Old 05-17-2007, 01:54 PM   #6
Hope comes with batteries
Forum Leader
 
nicholete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,364
vCash: 7754013
Donate
Send a message via AIM to nicholete Send a message via Yahoo to nicholete
Me thinks Mike doesn't like change.
nicholete is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 05-17-2007, 01:56 PM   #7
who me?
Admin
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: L.A. (Lower Arkansas)
Posts: 30,001
vCash: 14556672
Donate
Blog Entries: 18
I am all for change, I am not for someone that tries to come in and reinvent the wheel.

Hell, the Vikings miss picks when they have 15 minutes, just imagine shrinking it even more.
Mike is online now   Reply With Quote

Old 05-18-2007, 04:16 PM   #8
Who Me?
Admin
 
Miller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 16,090
vCash: 59047993
Donate
Blog Entries: 28
Send a message via AIM to Miller
Sounds like a change adverse person to me
Miller is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 05-18-2007, 07:46 PM   #9
Genibus Nitito Canus
Premium Member
Forum Leader
 
Sgt John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Taylor, TX
Posts: 6,808
vCash: 556529
Donate
Blog Entries: 5
Send a message via AIM to Sgt John Send a message via Yahoo to Sgt John
Maybe giving them less time to think would prevent stomach turning pics like Ted Ginn to the Dolphins
Sgt John is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Roger Goodell Wants NFL Players Held Accountable Mike Outlaw NFL Talk 1 02-02-2007 07:36 PM
Roger Goodell elected as new NFL Commissioner Mike Outlaw NFL Talk 1 08-08-2006 07:18 PM
Roger Goodell favorite to replace Tagliabue Mike Outlaw NFL Talk 0 07-16-2006 06:31 PM
Time limit? GBG Outlaw NFL Talk 5 02-05-2006 11:27 AM




An exclusive design by: Forumskin.com