Quantcast New England's camera man, and Roger Goodell's Handling Of The Situation - Page 7
Home Forum Articles Rankings Register Cheatsheets Waiver Wire Blogs Forum Spy S/O Sportsbook Fantasy Games Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools


Old 09-13-2007, 03:55 PM   #121
Outlaw
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 558
vCash: 8942
Donate
....and if it is a slap on the wrist, how many teams wouldn't use video devices and risk getting caught in exchange for gaining an advantage in the playoffs. Goodell went out of his way to make this a big deal in the offseason, how can he only give BB a slap on the wrist when BB broke the rule the very first chance he was given.
Bull is offline   Reply With Quote
Welcome to The The Sports Outlaw.

You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.

By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

As soon as you register, this box and ad will disappear.

Old 09-13-2007, 03:59 PM   #122
Outlaw
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bristol, PA
Posts: 371
vCash: 3071
Donate
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bull View Post
....and if it is a slap on the wrist, how many teams wouldn't use video devices and risk getting caught in exchange for gaining an advantage in the playoffs. Goodell went out of his way to make this a big deal in the offseason, how can he only give BB a slap on the wrist when BB broke the rule the very first chance he was given.
this is very true. How many times do you see teams make trades at the deadline that include young up and coming players to get a shot at the title this year. While they might be taking a risk at next year or the year after. They usually will do it to make their run at the playoffs now. So penelizing teams next year for what they are doing now is ludicris.
drworm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 09-13-2007, 04:11 PM   #123
Outlaw
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 558
vCash: 8942
Donate
Even though I'm a Colts fan and I can't stand the Pats. I also don't think I like the idea of taking away draft picks or giving the Pat a loss. I don't think it's fair to punish the players for something BB did and most if not all of the players didn't know much about it. I'd like to see a hefty fine and a lengthy suspension for BB alone. With the automatic 4 game suspension for steroids, I think it needs to be longer than that. I'd like to see a 5-8 game suspension and a couple of hundred thousand dollar fine maybe up to $500,000. I'd like that and think it would be a punishment that fits the crime, but I know we won't see it happen.
Bull is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 09-13-2007, 04:27 PM   #124
Upside Potential
 
savvyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 65
vCash: 14240
Donate
Personally, I'm happy that the Pats got caught. BB knows exactly what he is doing. Now the Pats get to play the us vs. the world card all year. He'll probably get suspended for 2 games at most and they will lose 1 or maybe 2 day 1 draft picks.

Meanwhile, he'll still be running the team while suspended, and the Pats are so good at stockpiling extra draft picks that the loss of picks won't matter that much.

End result: 12-4 AFC East Champions with a chip on their shoulder.

Anyone who thinks they will end up forfeiting the game or that BB will be suspended for more than 2 games is insane.

Never underestimate BB's meta-game skills.
savvyguy is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 09-13-2007, 04:32 PM   #125
Outlaw
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 558
vCash: 8942
Donate
Quote:
Originally Posted by savvyguy View Post
Personally, I'm happy that the Pats got caught. BB knows exactly what he is doing. Now the Pats get to play the us vs. the world card all year. He'll probably get suspended for 2 games at most and they will lose 1 or maybe 2 day 1 draft picks.

Meanwhile, he'll still be running the team while suspended, and the Pats are so good at stockpiling extra draft picks that the loss of picks won't matter that much.

End result: 12-4 AFC East Champions with a chip on their shoulder.

Anyone who thinks they will end up forfeiting the game or that BB will be suspended for more than 2 games is insane.

Never underestimate BB's meta-game skills.
No one thinks that. I only said that's what would be fair and what should happen. The fact that he'll get a slap on the wrist is what is bullshit. BTW, thanks for going out on a limb by claiming them the AFC East Champions. Shit, that's like calling the Colts the AFC South Champions. Duh.
Bull is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 09-13-2007, 06:13 PM   #126
Meatwhistle
 
GlennsPatriots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakeville MA
Posts: 1,235
vCash: 21697
Donate
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bull View Post
Even though I'm a Colts fan and I can't stand the Pats. I also don't think I like the idea of taking away draft picks or giving the Pat a loss. I don't think it's fair to punish the players for something BB did and most if not all of the players didn't know much about it. I'd like to see a hefty fine and a lengthy suspension for BB alone. With the automatic 4 game suspension for steroids, I think it needs to be longer than that. I'd like to see a 5-8 game suspension and a couple of hundred thousand dollar fine maybe up to $500,000. I'd like that and think it would be a punishment that fits the crime, but I know we won't see it happen.
ahhh.... aparhantly this amount is not so outrageous.
Early reports from a Boston telivision station is saying that Belichick will be fined personally (not to be paid by the team or owner) $500,000. and 2 hight draft picks, possably including a 1st, will be taken.
It appears this fracus is quite a bit more serious than I believed.
GlennsPatriots is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 09-13-2007, 06:58 PM   #127
A.D.I.D.A.S
Premium Member
Forum Leader
 
var8rfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Rocky Mount, VA
Posts: 3,351
vCash: 1700023
Donate
Blog Entries: 4
Send a message via AIM to var8rfan Send a message via Yahoo to var8rfan
I stated earlier that I din't think it was much of an advantage, but it is cheating as defined in the rule book, so to do it makes no sense at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bull View Post
Even though I'm a Colts fan and I can't stand the Pats. I also don't think I like the idea of taking away draft picks or giving the Pat a loss. I don't think it's fair to punish the players for something BB did and most if not all of the players didn't know much about it. I'd like to see a hefty fine and a lengthy suspension for BB alone. With the automatic 4 game suspension for steroids, I think it needs to be longer than that. I'd like to see a 5-8 game suspension and a couple of hundred thousand dollar fine maybe up to $500,000. I'd like that and think it would be a punishment that fits the crime, but I know we won't see it happen.
How do you not hurt the players and punish only BB? Let him finish out the season and then ban him from the NFL.
var8rfan is online now   Reply With Quote

Old 09-13-2007, 07:24 PM   #128
Yeah.......That's me!
 
Remote Controller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Top of the Texas Panhandle
Posts: 4,170
vCash: 370942
Donate
This would be righteous dude!!!
Remote Controller is online now   Reply With Quote

Old 09-13-2007, 08:02 PM   #129
Yeah.......That's me!
 
Remote Controller's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Top of the Texas Panhandle
Posts: 4,170
vCash: 370942
Donate
Bumped for no particular reason
Remote Controller is online now   Reply With Quote

Old 09-13-2007, 08:04 PM   #130
Hope comes with batteries
Forum Leader
 
nicholete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,364
vCash: 7754013
Donate
Send a message via AIM to nicholete Send a message via Yahoo to nicholete
NFL fines Pats coach Bill Belichick $500,000 and team $250,000 for taping opponent's signals - NFL - Yahoo! Sports
nicholete is online now   Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2007, 06:55 AM   #131
who me?
Admin
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: L.A. (Lower Arkansas)
Posts: 30,004
vCash: 14556857
Donate
Blog Entries: 18
Goodell is too inconsistent.

Wade Wilson (assistant coach) gets suspended and fined for using HGH, which has no effect in the NFL whatsoever.

Goodell goes up against a big name, and hands out a worthless fine, and a joke in regards to draft picks. The Patriots can go out in free agency and spend the money they would have on draft picks. No big loss there. As for the fine, Kraft will be paying that in some form or fashion.

As I expected, the Patriots, multiple offenders, got off with the equivalent of a "hand slap"
Mike is online now   Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2007, 07:18 AM   #132
Outlaw
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bristol, PA
Posts: 371
vCash: 3071
Donate
"I think they should forfeit, man," said Reno Mahe, whose Philadelphia Eagles lost the 2005 Super Bowl to the Patriots. "We won the Super Bowl. I think we should get it. I'm going to go trade my NFC championship ring for a Super Bowl ring."

I am sorry but as an Eagles fan, this is the best part of the whole article on Yahoo! HaHa.
Mahe, was the biggest part of their win and now has my vote for 2005 Super Bowl MVP.
drworm is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2007, 07:32 AM   #133
Outlaw
 
Birdman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,132
vCash: 88417
Donate
Send a message via AIM to Birdman
This punishment is really, really light. And what does making the playoffs have to do with the Patriots cheating history? The fact that they cheated in the past is punishable two ways based on what happens in the future? Huh?

I think the Pats got off easy, and will be fine. Kind of makes me angry...
Birdman is online now   Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2007, 07:41 AM   #134
Meatwhistle
 
GlennsPatriots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakeville MA
Posts: 1,235
vCash: 21697
Donate
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdman View Post
This punishment is really, really light. And what does making the playoffs have to do with the Patriots cheating history? The fact that they cheated in the past is punishable two ways based on what happens in the future? Huh?

I think the Pats got off easy, and will be fine. Kind of makes me angry...
yeah, I was confused also about the "if they make the playoffs" thing.... but after it digested I thought that by not making the playoffs this could be a #1-#20 pick (not likely the Pats will have the #1 but if another team is found guilty of this...). So Goodell covered his arse in the case of another team were to be penalized, a bad team, (like say the Jets), not to take their #1 and cripple the team for another 5 years.
The Patriots having 2 first rd picks should have no bearing on the penalty.
GlennsPatriots is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2007, 08:28 AM   #135
Outlaw
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 558
vCash: 8942
Donate
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike View Post
Goodell is too inconsistent.

Wade Wilson (assistant coach) gets suspended and fined for using HGH, which has no effect in the NFL whatsoever.

Goodell goes up against a big name, and hands out a worthless fine, and a joke in regards to draft picks. The Patriots can go out in free agency and spend the money they would have on draft picks. No big loss there. As for the fine, Kraft will be paying that in some form or fashion.

As I expected, the Patriots, multiple offenders, got off with the equivalent of a "hand slap"
Good Point, Mike. How can a coach get suspended for something that had no effect on any games and Bellicheat gets no suspension at all. I was in Goodell's camp on the Vick thing and thought he was just being patient, but this is unbelievable. BB gets caught cheating and is on the sideline for the next game. Plus, to your point of the draft picks. They have 2 first rounders anyway and more than likely their first rounder won't be their earliest pick. Taking away the 32 pick when they have the 24th pick also, doesn't really hit them too hard.
Bull is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2007, 09:06 AM   #136
Outlaw
 
deuce4321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 1,114
vCash: 1023058
Donate
Blog Entries: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlennsPatriots View Post
So Goodell covered his arse in the case of another team were to be penalized, a bad team, (like say the Jets), not to take their #1 and cripple the team for another 5 years.
I know this comment was placed just so i could respond. Not a harsh penalty. Who gets the pick(s) lost? Jets were 10-6 last season and made playoffs.
deuce4321 is online now   Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2007, 09:33 AM   #137
Meatwhistle
 
GlennsPatriots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakeville MA
Posts: 1,235
vCash: 21697
Donate
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bull View Post
Good Point, Mike. How can a coach get suspended for something that had no effect on any games and Bellicheat gets no suspension at all. I was in Goodell's camp on the Vick thing and thought he was just being patient, but this is unbelievable. BB gets caught cheating and is on the sideline for the next game.
I guarantee that if you gave Belicheat the choice, he would rather serve a suspention than give up that 1st rd draft pick.
Quote:
Plus, to your point of the draft picks. They have 2 first rounders anyway and more than likely their first rounder won't be their earliest pick. Taking away the 32 pick when they have the 24th pick also, doesn't really hit them too hard.
Again, you can't use the fact that the Pats own 2 1st rd draft picks when deciding their penalty. Don't lose sight of the fact that your taking away the next Brandon Merriweather or Lawrence Maroney calibur player on the Pats for the next 4-5 years ...and every other team benifits as they move up a slot, not just for the 1st rd, but for the rest of the draft.
**alright Deuce, you got me... the Jets are respectable. (ugh...I just threw up in my mouth). No one gets the pick... it just gets skipped.
GlennsPatriots is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2007, 09:50 AM   #138
Outlaw
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 558
vCash: 8942
Donate
Quote:
Originally Posted by GlennsPatriots View Post
I guarantee that if you gave Belicheat the choice, he would rather serve a suspention than give up that 1st rd draft pick.
Again, you can't use the fact that the Pats own 2 1st rd draft picks when deciding their penalty. Don't lose sight of the fact that your taking away the next Brandon Merriweather or Lawrence Maroney calibur player on the Pats for the next 4-5 years ...and every other team benifits as they move up a slot, not just for the 1st rd, but for the rest of the draft.
**alright Deuce, you got me... the Jets are respectable. (ugh...I just threw up in my mouth). No one gets the pick... it just gets skipped.
The reason the Pats are favored to win the superbowl this year is due to 3 things. #1 BB is the head coach. #2 Brady is your starting QB. #3 and they saw their point of weakness last year (WR) and fixed the issue during free agency not the draft (Chad Jackson still hasn't played). If you suspend BB for 5 games (It would have to be more than Wade Wilson), maybe the Pats don't have home field advantage and maybe don't have a first round bye (probably not, because I still don't think that cry baby Mangini could finish with a better record than the Pats). I'm not saying a suspension in place of losing the draft picks, I'm saying in addition to losing the picks.
Bull is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2007, 09:52 AM   #139
Outlaw
 
deuce4321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 1,114
vCash: 1023058
Donate
Blog Entries: 8
I lived in Boston for 4 years from 2002-2006. Including SB victories by Pats and a unbelievable World Series run by the Sox. Being a hard core Yankee and Jet fan it was a hard pill to swallow and i found myself defending/degrading the ny/boston teams. I lived on the common and found it hillarious that during the pats victory parades the fans would be shouting out yankees suck.
deuce4321 is online now   Reply With Quote

Old 09-14-2007, 10:21 AM   #140
Upside Potential
 
savvyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 65
vCash: 14240
Donate
I've been a Boston guy all my life, and I can't stand the "yankees suck" chants... It was annoying before 2004 series, now it's just stupid and rediculous. Problem is a "yankees suck" chant in NE will catch on as fast as a "USA" chant will catch on anywhere else in the country. So all it takes is a few boneheads to get it started.
savvyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
roger goodell, spygate

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Roger Clemens to return to Yankees nicholete The Outlaw Hideout 15 05-10-2007 08:11 PM
England's Keeper is a Beast! dannywest The Outlaw Hideout 1 03-23-2007 05:59 AM
Roger Goodell Wants NFL Players Held Accountable Mike Outlaw NFL Talk 1 02-02-2007 07:36 PM
Roger Goodell elected as new NFL Commissioner Mike Outlaw NFL Talk 1 08-08-2006 07:18 PM
Roger Clemens Wins 7th Cy Young at 42.... Zepp The Outlaw Hideout 13 12-14-2004 09:14 PM




An exclusive design by: Forumskin.com