Absolutely, name the conditions

Im down for standard scoring or PPR.

1 point for every 10 yards, 6 for every TD.

I'm willing to wager however many Vbucks you're willing to lose!!

I'm notorious for losing all of my money but whatever I have come payup time is fair game. We can do PPR for a more realistic representation of their seasons.

Standard or PPR?
How many VBucks?

betting vbucks?

sack up dudes. avatar bet. loser wears it until the 2009 season starts.

Like I said, I'll wager whatever!!

Avatar bet. I say Mustang can design it for the loser. I like his style

You're on Mr Slabaugh

Just locking this bet in.

Dont worry. I will stash this away for the end of week 17

__________________
2008 Black Knights Football - 12 wins isn't enough

I'm takin the guy that's not competing for touches with LT and AG. In this case that man is Roddy White.

Both are probably decent options this year at their ADP, but I feel more comfortable with Chambers, not knowing what the QB situation will be like in Atlanta this year.

Chambers looked to be settling in pretty well in San Diego toward the end of the season, and in the playoffs, and he is a best WR option that the Chargers have had in a while.

__________________
Links of interest at The Sports Outlaw

Player Rankings
QB | RB | RB (PPR) | WR | WR (PPR) | TE | TE (PPR) | K | DEF

Cheatsheets (Updated weekly up until gametime)

Weekly Waiver Wire (A weekly looks at some key waiver wire/free agent grabs)

Key Forums: NFL Talk | Fantasy Football Advice | College Football

cool, but becareful here, cause I deny that chambers is consistant.

Here is what I have seen and found:
2001 - 16 games - 48 rec. - 883 yards - 7 Tds
2002 - 15 games - 52 rec. - 734 yards - 3 Tds
2003 - 16 games - 64 rec. - 963 yards - 11 Tds **
2004 - 15 games - 69 rec. - 898 yards - 7 Tds
2005 - 16 games - 82 rec. - 1118 yards - 11 Tds **
2006 - 16 games - 59 rec. - 677 yards - 4 Tds
2007 - 6 games - 31 rec. - 415 yards - 0 Tds
2008 - 10 games - 66 rec. - 970 yards - 4 Tds

I don't see any consistancy at all. I see a very up and down going toward the tail end of a career competing on a team that has better targets to throw to in Gates and Tomlinson.

White:
2005 - 16 games - 29 rec. - 446 yards - 3Tds
2006 - 16 games - 30 rec. - 506 yards - 0 Tds
2007 - 16 games - 83 rec. - 1202 yards - 6 Tds **

Now here is what I see. A young reciever, who improved in his third year, but more importantly, he stepped up when the team was down due to loss of the Qb in Vick. As for a more rush oriented in ATL, keep in mind that was the focus always in ATL. Vick was the lead carrier for the most part. But with Dunn hurt, the offense even with a "so - so" Qb in Redmon was able to produce a 1200 yard receiver...something Chambers has NEVER done.

Net, I will take the improving young Wr, who came out in his third year...than a notorious up and down receiver who is #3 option.

__________________
Expert on nothing, opinionated on everything...

to everyone who calls roddy white the improving WR, be careful here. lots and lots of WRs, as we all know, have a breakout season in year two or three. and history says that most of them REGRESS the next year, at least stats wise. now that theyve broken out, defenses tend to pay some more attention to them and what not. so just because white busted out with 80/1200/6 does NOT mean that you should mark him down for 90/1300/8 this year. too often, this is one of the biggest statistical mistakes made when people project. players do not continue an upward trend of improvement. rather the stat trends should return toward the norm. in a young players case, we do not yet know what the "norm" is yet for certain, but in most cases, it will be lower than their early "breakout" year.

just some food for thought.

id take roddy here if i have to take one of the two because i think chambers is an overrated piece of garbage who would only be valuable if he lucks into 8-10 TDs again. 900 yards and 6 TDs, woohoo, no thanks. i dont like roddy a ton, but its an easy pick next to chambers.

__________________
Hired Guns: Wheaton Thunder
SO CFFL: Royale with Cheese
CFA: Wheaton Thunder

Chambers for me. One of the things I have learned about this game is to take the guy on the team that will score the most points. Atlanta will struggle to do this and San Diego will not.

another pro-white vote. i'll steal from Sgt_John, Chambers is the 3rd option in SD, behind LT & Gates, thats just not that good for me.

I'll take the young WR who at least has the potential to rise. I mean, last year Atlanta was in the bottom 5 in offense and he still put up good stats. It is not like Atlanta can take a huge step back this year. I see no reason to penalize White based on that.

Roddy White - I like his chances to continue performing. Even if Chambers wasn't the #3 option on the Chargers I might still take White. Chambers has done nothing but disappoint since he came into the league.

not the biggest fan of chambers, but nothing but disappoint?? isnt that insanely harsh? He has cracked 10+ TDs on two seperate occasions. Not somebody i would classify as a complete bust.

Quite a time ago though...don't you think?

yeah, but his post didnt say he was a disappointment in SD or the last couple years, just disappointment. lol