Quantcast Bush's Iraq Plan - Congressional Criticism Mounts
Home Forum Articles Rankings Register Cheatsheets Waiver Wire Blogs Forum Spy S/O Sportsbook Fantasy Games Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools


Old 02-01-2007, 12:28 PM   #1
Outlaw
 
Birdman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,124
vCash: 88210
Donate
Send a message via AIM to Birdman
Bush's Iraq Plan - Congressional Criticism Mounts

A revised Senate resolution criticizing President Bush’s troop buildup in Iraq, offered by Senator John Warner, Republican of Virginia, drew new support today as two of the authors of a sterner resolution of disapproval said they would accept the Warner compromise.

Senators Joseph Biden, Democrat of Delaware, and Chuck Hagel, Republican of Nebraska, said they would back Mr. Warner’s new wording, which among other changes removed language that Democrats saw as creating a potential loophole.


“The bottom line of our resolutions is the same: Mr. President, don’t send more Americans into the middle of civil war,” said Mr. Biden, one of the authors of the resolution that was approved last week by the Foreign Relations Committee, which he chairs.


Senator Carl Levin, Democrat of Michigan and chairman of the Armed Services Committee, was the third author of that plan; on Wednesday night he had agreed to support Mr. Warner, the ranking Republican on that committee.


The Democratic leadership of the Senate now intends to use Mr. Warner’s proposal, co-sponsored by Senators Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, and Ben Nelson, Democrat of Nebraska, as the basis for the debate that will unfold next week, though Republicans could still raise procedural obstacles.


The Senate Republican leadership intends to mount vigorous resistance to any plan that rejects Mr. Bush’s troop buildup and has concentrated in recent days on trying to prevent Republicans from joining Mr. Warner.
Backers of the new Warner resolution will likely need to attract at least a dozen Republicans to reach the 60-vote total required to overcome a filibuster or other procedural obstacles. Six Republicans have so far voiced their support.


And some Democrats are possible opponents, arguing that the measure does not go far enough in blocking Mr. Bush’s initiative, meaning even more members of Mr. Bush’s party might have to be persuaded to sign on.
Birdman is online now   Reply With Quote
Welcome to The The Sports Outlaw.

You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.

By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

As soon as you register, this box and ad will disappear.
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tim Brown adds criticism to Walsh’s offense The Ram Outlaw NFL Talk 2 09-29-2006 02:39 PM
Reggie Bush's stock falling? Birdman Outlaw NFL Talk 5 04-10-2006 09:47 AM
Worthwhile or Don't Plan On Winning afrodesiak Outlaw NFL Talk 3 08-31-2005 07:53 AM
Bush's Texas Life-Support Law Bucknut The Outlaw Hideout 4 03-23-2005 10:53 AM




An exclusive design by: Forumskin.com